Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of clinical practice changes in an effort to reduce peripherally inserted central catheter thrombosis risk.

Patients and Method: A retrospective analysis of adult patients in the acute care setting.

Results: A total number of 1307 charts of patients who received PICCs were reviewed encompassing the months of January 2008, October 2008 and August 2010. During the period from January 2008 to October 2008, clinical practice changes were made to include the use of ultrasound guidance. Ensuring catheter tip termination in the superior vena cava with the addition of ultrasound technology as an insertion practice combined to decrease symptomatic PICC related deep vein thrombosis rates from 4.8 % to 2.9%. During the period from October 2008 to August 2010, an additional practice was introduced that involved measurement and documentation of vein diameters(without the use of a tourniquet) prior to all PICC insertion procedures. Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) rates dropped further from 2.9 % to 1.4 % during this period.

Conclusion: Obtaining central tip location and using ultrasound guidance for PICC placement are effective in reducing PICC related DVT. Additionally, routine measurement of vein diameters in their native state and use of that information to ensure that the vessel diameter is at least twice the outer diameter of the catheter is an effective practice to reduce DVT rates and reduce thrombosis risk.

Abstract

A group of seven nurses from a range of laboratory and hospital settings across the United States were invited to present opinions and clinical case study examples that reflect the key considerations in peripheral blood sample collection involving lower volume samples and patients affected by difficult venous access (DVA). Panelists were asked to review and compare prevailing standard operating procedures (SOPs) in sample collection and challenges in efforts to expand the use of lower volume sample collection and processing. The discussion identified achievable goals to improve standard of care in lower volume blood sample collection and the treatment of DVA patients.

Abstract

The consequences of random PICC practice can be serious and manifest as deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, catheter related bloodstream infection, and post thrombotic syndrome. Risk factors related to site selection have been well established for other central venous access devices, but not for ultrasound guided PICC insertion in the upper arm. The author presents observations of upper arm PICC insertion designated by color zones to highlight the variability of PICC practice. The author also details site risk factors associated with each color zone and proposes an ideal insertion location for upper arm ultrasound guided PICC procedures.

The PICC Zone Insertion Method (ZIM) is a proposed system design for patient safety related to PICC insertions; performed by optimizing and organizing the clinical approach. It aids in identifying the Ideal Zone for upper arm needle insertion with ultrasound guidance. The significance of a systematic approach is that it is reproducible, measurable, and as a result will reduce variation in PICC insertion practice. The ZIM combines known mechanisms for vascular access insertion site complications with a systematic measuring and ultrasound scanning process, to reduce the impact of site risk factors. The impact of thrombosis cannot be underestimated, as it will likely limit the future use of veins for life saving vascular access. This issue should not be ignored by hospitals or clinicians, in fact, systematic solutions like PICC Zone Insertion Method, should be explored and supported as part of a comprehensive approach to vascular access care.