Editorial Type:
Article Category: Research Article
 | 
Online Publication Date: 01 Sept 2016

Indications for Peripheral, Midline, and Central Catheters: Summary of the Michigan Appropriateness Guide for Intravenous Catheters Recommendations

RN and
MD
Page Range: 140 – 148
DOI: 10.1016/j.java.2016.06.002
Save
Download PDF

Abstract

Patients admitted to acute care frequently require intravenous access to effectively deliver medications and prescribed treatment. For patients with difficult intravenous access; those requiring multiple attempts; and those who are obese, have diabetes, or have other chronic conditions, determining the vascular access device (VAD) with the lowest risk that best meets the needs of the treatment plan can be confusing. Selection of a VAD should be based on specific indications for that device. In clinical settings, requests for central venous access devices are frequently precipitated simply by failure to establish peripheral access. Selection of the most appropriate VAD is necessary to avoid the potentially serious complications of infection and/or thrombosis. An international panel of experts convened to establish a guide for indications and appropriate use for VADs. This article summarizes the work and recommendations of the panel that created the Michigan Appropriateness Guide for Intravenous Catheters.

Copyright: Copyright © 2016, ASSOCIATION FOR VASCULAR ACCESS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Contributor Notes

Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Nancy@piccexcellence.com

CE indicates that continuing education contact hours are available for this activity. Earn the contact hours by reading this article and completing the test available at www.avainfo.org/JAVACE.

  • Download PDF